buy custom Principles of Biomedical Ethics essay

buy custom Principles of Biomedical Ethics essay Mr Harveys chances of recovering are high and the health professionals should base their decision on this fact. The fact that he has been improving is a good sign that he will be well if he continues with his treatment. The health professionals are guided by medical ethics, which guides them to make decisions, which are of best interest to all the concerned parties. In a situation such as this where they are in a dilemma and do not know whether to lie to the medical authorities in order to save the life of Mr. Harvey or to tell the truth and let his condition worsen, they should therefore base their decision on the medical ethic (Beachamp, 2001). In this case, moral values are in conflict and the decision they make will affect either the patient or them. They should prioritise the patients recovery rather than the Medicare authorities. The decision lies solely on them as the patient is in a comma, and they will use paternalism approach to determine the best course of action. Even though paternalism has been criticized in the past, and many opting for autonomy, where the patient makes the decisions, it cannot be so in this case for the patient is in a comma. Unfortunately, they are not the only parties that are concerned. They are the ones who will influence the decision of the Medicare authorities to either continue or discontinue paying Mr. Harveys bills. Another option they can consider is to advocate for a change in the terms and conditions provided by the Medicare authorities, considering the fact that Mr. Harvey is showing signs of recovery. They can do this by finding outcomes that will benefit both the patient and the Medicare authorities (Baruch, 1988). They can also use Beneficence which is the ethical obligation to do the right and good things for other people in according to their needs. In the case of Mr. Harvey, the best option is to lie to the authorities so that he can continue with his treatment. Buy custom Principles of Biomedical Ethics essay

Dryopithecus Facts and Figures

Dryopithecus Facts and Figures Name:  Dryopithecus (Greek for tree ape); pronounced DRY-oh-pith-ECK-us Habitat:  Woodlands of Eurasia and Africa Historical Epoch:  Middle Miocene (15-10 million years ago) Size and Weight:  About four feet long and 25 pounds Diet:  Fruit Distinguishing Characteristics:  Moderate size; long front arms; chimpanzee-like head   About Dryopithecus One of the many prehistoric primates of the Miocene epoch (a close contemporary was Pliopithecus), Dryopithecus was a tree-dwelling ape that originated in eastern Africa about 15 million years ago and then (like its hominid descendants millions of years later) radiated out into Europe and Asia. Dryopithecus was only remotely related to modern humans; this ancient ape had chimpanzee-like limbs and facial features, and it probably alternated between walking on its knuckles and running on its hind legs (especially when it was being chased by predators). On the whole, though, Dryopithecus probably spent most of its time high up in trees, subsisting on fruit (a diet we can infer from its relatively weak cheek teeth, which wouldnt have been able to handle tougher vegetation). The oddest fact about Dryopithecus, and one that has generated much confusion, is that this primate lived mostly in western Europe rather than Africa. Today, Europe isnt exactly known for its monkeys and apes - the only indigenous species is the Barbary macaque, which is barely European, confined as it is to the coast of southern Spain, where it has penetrated from its usual habitat in northern Africa. Its possible, though far from proven, that the true crucible of primate evolution during the later Cenozoic Era was Europe rather than Africa, and that after the diversification of monkeys and apes these primates migrated from Europe and populated (or repopulated) the continents for which theyre best known today, Africa, Asia, and South America.